I will join the dharna if sufficient notice is given to me. MA Ansari is an angel compared to UP SIC.
Rakesh Agarwal From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bimal Khemani Sent: 06 September 2008 21:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: urvashi sharma; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Hemant Goswami; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [rti4empowerment] Re: [INDIARTI] Re: [HumJanenge] Ansari's novel interprentation of "information" We have more that 100 appeals pending at SIC LUCKNOW, the fate of all is not known. We rti activist of aligarh is planning to stage one day dharna before the office of Sri Brajesh Mishra chief information commissioner some time in the month of october to press to held the hearing of all the cases at ALIGARH at an early date. On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 urvashi sharma wrote : >rakeshji >in up sic ic brijesh kumar mishra has the same attitude. it pinches me >somewhere deep in my heart when such persons are invited n honoured in >public functions . but in today's world everything has become >political and thats why everything we plan , fails in the end.we >should chalk out a plan at national level to rate ics of all >commissions and discard all such ics that act against the act >knowingly . > >is arvindji listening > >On 9/5/08, Rakesh Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Information Commission M.A. Ansari read out section 2(j) to me and said that > > a Commissioner can decide to allow inspection in lieu of copies of > > documents. He also said that since Inspection is mentioned in clause (i) and > > copies in clause (ii), I should be grateful if he gave me access under the > > "preferential" clause. > > The hearing took place yesterday in a case where Department of Posts had > > asked me to deposit more than Rs.1,25,000 as "Labour charges". As half > > expected, he accused me of malafide and said that I cannot expect the > > government officers to do research for me. > > All I wanted was the delivery status of all articles sent through speed > > post across the country on one particular day - chosen at random - in order > > to assess their performance. My speed post articles were being delivered in > > 3 to 10 days within the same city and some articles either went missing or > > were delivered to the wrong address. Mr. Ansari said I should visit their > > offices across the country and inspect the status for myself; this is when > > he mentioned the "preferential" clause. > > I am preparing a writ for Delhi High Court. This is the 3rd such instance > > with Ansari over the last two years. I have immense respect for other ICs > > but whilst Padma's knowledge of RTI is elementary, Ansari is an example of > > how to deliberately and shamelessly kill transparency and accountability. > > A copy of Premchand's "Panch Parmeshwar" is on the way to Ansari - with a > > bouquet. > > Rakesh Agarwal > > NyayaBhoomi > > > > >-- >urvashi sharma >(social worker & rti activist) >F-2108 EKTA PARK , RAJAJIPURAM >LUCKNOW - UTTAR PRADESH - 226017 >MOBILE - 09305463313 BIMAL KUMAR KHEMANI Saha-Prant Sangathan Mantri, AKHIL BHARATIYA GRAHAK PANCHAYAT BRAJ PRANT, 2/40D, Janakpuri, Marrish Road, ALIGARH-202001. INDIA Phone:0571-2401557, MOB:-09359724625 e.mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
