My hearing, observation, comments at State information 
commissioner's Mumbai

After a long wait of almost one year I got intimation to come for my 
2nd appeal hearings, I was delighted but after the hearing came out 
heartbroken and dejected

My 7 appeals were regarding documents to be obtained from the 
Society by the Dy.Registar,

Past history: I had asked the society in writing to give me certain 
documents u/s
Sec 32 of the MCS act, such as managing committee meetings, etc the 
said society did not respond, as such moved the Dy.Registar of CHS 
H/W ward Bandra with much perseverance Dy.Registar send letters 
after letters to the society to give me the said documents, Society 
did not respond, finally in July 2007 he send them an order under 
sec 79(2) , still no response,  I persuaded with the Dy.Registar who 
again send letter to society to comply with his orders, but society 
did not respond, as Dy.Registar failed to take action against 
society for not complying with his orders, I moved the Dist 
Dy.Registar  Shri Vikas Rascal who wrote to the Dy.Registar to look 
into the matter and report his findings to him within 15 days, still 
no response, the Dy Registar got transferred and came a new 
Dy.Registar who does not wish to talk but says to talk to his 
subordinates
Simultaneously I asked for the documents through RTI, the Dy 
Registar said I should
Get it from the society, 

Happening and Observations at State information office mumbai
The office looks swanky, lot of office staff using computers, there 
is a water cooler
where there is  cold water to soothe ones nerves, my hearing was 
scheduled at 10:30 am but SIC came in at about 12 noon. 
Before the hearing begins, the PIO (not exactly the PIO but his 
clerk) and myself were asked to sign the hearing petition, I 
protested that I will sign the paper after the hearing as per 
standard procedures practiced everywhere, however they insisted that 
I should sign otherwise the hearing will not take place, I had no 
choice but to sign under protest  
At the hearing Shri Triwari told me that I can obtain documents only 
what is there at 
Dy. Registars office ( even this lots of files are missing from Dy. 
Registars office )  and that I should apply to society and get it, I 
showed him documents that I had done so and also used MCS act sec 32 
to get the documents  
I cited sec 2F of RTI act, information relating to any private body 
(Society) which can be accessed by a public authority ( Dy.Registar 
of CHS ) under any other law for the time being in force ( 
Maharashtra co-operative society act sec 32  ) and told him it was 
the duty of the Dy.Registar to get the said documents from society. 
He said he knows sec 2F of RTI act, I requested Shri Triwari to put 
down my argument 
on record ( Rosnama ) as it is standard procedures at hearings  he 
said it was not his policy to do so, I have other hearings scheduled 
next week, I told Shri Triwari I will not attend further hearings as 
hearings are not conducted in proper manner, 
This according to me is a mockery of the RTI act; Retired Babus are 
given the post
Tax payers money is used to pay these babus and staff etc, no 
penalties  ever imposed
Thus is very teeth of the act is become toothless
The PIO's thus have become immune to the system and unless stringent 
methods are 
Imposed RIP to RTI  People have lost their faith in RTI, many times 
the applicant is harassed for using RTI  counter case is made,  as 
observed very few  attend seminars on RTI as RTI has become a farce.
Now what choice do I have to file writ petition against   the 
impugnent order of SIC ( spend over Rs 20,000) as I am retired I 
would rather keep that money for my old age. 
I asked Some clarifications  from SIC, why PIO not present, he said 
it is ok clerk can attend, I then asked him if I cannot attend can 
someone else attend on my behalf, he said yes if you give an 
authority letter.

Leslie Almeida   
 



Reply via email to