Thanks a lot Mr Chhugani
I have a lot of things more to tell to my friends.
Law says that if there is complaint against a Senior police officer,
the Govt. advocate, should not assist him, because he is an accused in the
case being heard before court.
but the truth is that the Govt. advocate in the High Court argued
before the hon. court and begged for pardon on behalf of the said culprit
police officer.
As such what ever you have written, is a true fact.
Regards
Dr.JN Sharma
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Indur Chhugani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
> All those who have power, to implement the law or pass orders citing the
> law, which includes the so called Hon'ble Judges of the High Court treat the
> law as their pet dog.
>
> "Moti bite that man, he is questioning our authority" or "Moti go to that
> corner and shut your eyes, this man is my friend, he is from the police".
>
> Thereafter they twist their reasonings and cite the law.
> The law has to be implemented, by using a little common sense, which those
> in power have but misuse, to favour the corrupt and those, who can provide
> favours after retirement or even while they are still in the same post.
>
> I K Chhugani
> http://www.RoguePolice.com <http://www.roguepolice.com/> ... 098201 71571
>
> I K Chhugani
> http://www.RoguePolice.com <http://www.roguepolice.com/>
> Mobile 091 98201 71571
>
> --- On Wed, 10/29/08, Jagnarain Sharma <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]<jagnarain.sharma%40gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> From: Jagnarain Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<jagnarain.sharma%40gmail.com>
> >
> Subject: [rti_india] Re: Please think very deeply on the issue of the
> Judiciary !
> To: "Bibek Anand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <sampadaway%40gmail.com>>
> Cc: "Dr. Leo Rebello" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<prof.leorebello%40gmail.com>>,
> "nirajklko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <nirajklko%40yahoo.com>>, "RTI4" <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <rti4empowerment%40yahoogroups.com>>,
> "urvashi sharma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<rtimahilamanchup%40gmail.com>>,
> "robby sharma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <sharmarobby%40hotmail.com>>,
> "Sidharth rti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <sidharthbbsr%40gmail.com>>,
> "RTI_india" <[email protected] <RTI_india%40yahoogroups.com>>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <rti4ngo%40yahoogroups.com>, "Wajahat Habibullah"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <whabibullah%40nic.in>>, "[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]<HumJanenge%40yahoogroups.co.in>"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <HumJanenge%40yahoogroups.co.in>>
> Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2008, 4:10 PM
>
>
> Dear Bibek Anand
> Yes we need to move very cautiously. A few days back I met Dr. Niraj
> Kumar, who told that the matter of formation of judicial council, which was
> approved by cabinet, is now before the Parliament, and till that date we
> have to watch and see.
> After the formation of judicial council, on the matter of any
> complaint, the council will keep a watch on Judges(Corrupt) , against whom
> complaints are received.
> On 19=10=2008, I was at Mumbai to attend a meeting at the residence of
> Dr Rebello, where about 15 participants were present. Major Ravi and Dr.
> Leo
> Rebello, agreed with me that the presiding officer of the proposed council
> must be Vice President of India and Appellete authority be President of
> India. Otherwise, till date it is our experience that fellow brother Judges
> take the side of their own fellow brother Judges. Even chief Justice Of
> India can not be an exception to it. How the Ministry of Law is thinking
> and it is moving in what direction, we are not aware till date.
> The Ministry's view may not be the same what we are apprehending.
> I am writing this on the basis of my own experience as also what we
> have observed by recent impeachment issue, which is still hanging .
> If Judicial council will be strict, we can hope that Judges will have
> a fear in their mind. Otherwise they treat themselves as GOD, and not only
> GOD but SUPER GOD.
> At the moment there is no yard stick to measure the level of
> corruption in judiciary, but it is rampant and particularly the Judges who
> are given posting in the same state where they were practicing as
> Advocates,
> it has taken worst shape.
> Second aspect is also important, i.e. of Advocate sons of father
> Judges. The son advocates are earning crores of Rupees, in a year in
> Lucknow
> High Court. One such son advocate of father Judge paid Rs. 22.00 lakhs as
> Income Tax last financial year, to make the black money as white
> money,showing about Rs. 2.00 crores of income. If you see his Vakalatnama
> on
> record of the High court, it may not be beyond Rs. 15 Lakhs income in a
> year
> and that too when they appear before Uncle Judges( because they can
> not appear before the court of their father judge and that income can also
> not be shown in return), which fact is a open secret.
> The modus operandi is very simple that when a client (of Murder
> convict) or other client with Heavy value property litigation requires,
> favourable order from a Judge,he find out the son advocate of that Judge,
> who charges hefty fees.
> This Son advocate have a panel of junior / tout advocates, who in
> proxy are appearing on behalf of son advocate before his father Judge and
> tout/junior advocate simply move his lips when he appear before the father
> Judge, the Judge deliver the judgement in his favour.The junior advocates
> are paid Rs. 1000/- to 2000/- only, whereas son advocate charges between
> Rs.
> 1.00 lakh to 50.00 Lakhs, as the gravity of the case desires.
> It is also a truth that in one of the case the said son advocate
> managed fake Ex-parte contempt order in favour of a client from his father
> judge against a person with a punishment order, to teach him a lession.
> It is a truth and nothing less than a truth, and only victim can
> describe it, who has suffered due to this (mischief ?)
> Any way let us hope for the good as GOD is great. May God help us and
> the humanity at large.
> Regards
> Dr.JN Sharma
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Bibek Anand <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Bibek Anand <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com>
> > Date: Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:21 PM
> > Subject: Some out of the box thinking for the judiciary !
> > To: Jagnarain Sharma <jagnarain.sharma@ gmail.com>
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear Sir ,
> >
> > Namaskar !
> > Judiciary is one of the three
> > pillars of the governance . But it has some reservations regarding the
> check
> > and balance system as enshrined in the constitution . Judiciary too
> > should be subjected to the ethos of accountability. Being the judge of
> one's
> > own issues negates the very fundamental principle of justice .
> >
> > With so many skeletons coming out
> > of the cup-board in the judicial sphere even in the regime of contempt of
> > court , scheme are making right thinking people apprehensive. There is no
> > guarantee of the moral rectitude in the present setup of the judiciary .
> The
> > principle of Contempt should be taken as the last resort . But the
> > institution of the judiciary must desire this power to continue after
> > deserving it genuinely .
> >
> > In the present knowledge era, it
> > is highly imperative , that people from various walks of life should be
> > allowed to enter the hallowed portals of the judiciary . This will
> > definitely lead to better understanding of the various issues, and
> > strengthen the internal fabric of the judicial system . Morality,
> > rationality , domain knowledge , and the legal aptitude should be the
> > essential prerequisites for the entrants . Those having not possessing a
> > degree in law at the time of the appointment , should be imparted a crash
> > course in judicial academies . This innovative scheme will bring the
> > opportunity to the brightest persons in the society to further the cause
> of
> > justice and upholding truth.
> >
> > Post-retirement assignments in
> > various government slots should be discouraged , and rather teaching
> > assignments and undertaking social initiatives should be encouraged among
> > the retirees so that society may be guided to tread on the saner path .
> > However a very generous scheme of post-retirement benefits must
> necessarily
> > be provided to the superannuated judges. There should also be some seats
> > reserved in our parliament and the state legislatures for the retired
> > judges . There should be at least 10 times raise in the judicial
> positions .
> > By this way, we will be truly heralding an era of the rule of law nay
> > justice . Judges having different educational background and selected on
> the
> > basis of a stringent test, of both their knowledge and their personal
> > integrity , will really steer the society on a correct path .
> >
> > Hope, these suggestions will be
> > taken into consideration , if we really want a reformed judiciary .
> However
> > it is another matter, a truly sane idea is normally jeered at , or at
> worst
> > throttled out .
> >
> > Regards!
> >
> > Yours truly,
> >
> > Bibek Kumar Anand
> > Convener " SAMPADA"
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
