Is this a speaking order? Is it clear therefrom if the applicant has asked for the identical information in each application? Every decision cannot be given by in formulaic manner.
http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/MA-01092008-09.pdf "4. On perusal of the documents submitted by the parties, it is noted that both the parties have erred. The appellant has unnecessarily submitted multiple applications for seeking information relating to canteen and staffing pattern, which are not confidential. The appellant should have asked for the information through a single application and also submitted only one appeal before the Commission against the decision of the respondent, which could have economize the resources in seeking and providing the information. Likewise, the CPIO could have given a comprehensive response in respect of all the appeals, rather then giving an identical reply in all the cases."
