Renowned Advocate Firm is suffering from Un-availability of Counsels� leadings 
to their Multinational Clients.

M/S. Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff & Co., is a renowned firm of 
Advocates and Solicitors, and filed Civil Writ Petition No. 6094 of 2007 
against Central Information Commission and others including me (Milap 
Choraria), on behalf of their Multinational clients M/s. J P Morgan India P. 
Ltd., Mumbai, interalia claiming that the Petitioner have proprietary rights 
over the Valuation Report of Centaur Airport Hotel (the then owned and 
controlled by an undertaking of Government of India) prepared by them as Global 
Adviser for disinvestment of various properties of Hotel Corporation of India 
Limited, and Government of India undertaking .

In fact on my application, by Order dated 31st July, 2007, the Hon'ble 
Information Commissioner Shri O P Kejriwal, in Case No. CIC/OK/A/2006/00164 
directed to the Ministry of Civil Aviation to disclose the entire (Valuation) 
report to me by 20th August, 2007.

Thereafter M/S. Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff & Co., represented by 
Mr. Shardul S. Shroff and Ms. Pallavi S. Shroff moved the aforesaid Writ 
Petition on behalf of their aforesaid Multinational Clients M/s. J P Morgan 
India P. Ltd., and obtained Ex-Party Ad-interim Order. I filed my respective 
objections and also filed appropriate documents against their aforesaid claims.

In the aforesaid matter, from the least last two dates i.e. 7th August, 2008 
and 10th December, 2008, they obtained adjournments on the alleged grounds of 
UN-AVAILABILITY of the Counsel leading to the Petitioner.

I want to put for the knowledge of the general public that according to USA 
Media Reports, JP Morgan Chase�, the parent Company of the above named 
Petitioner, brought down the Lehman Brothers, and was also questioned by USA 
Senate Energy Subcommittee on Oil Bets, which were as we understood�  (if I am 
not wrong), was� starting point of the collapsing of world wide Share Markets 
including Wall Street and other Stock Exchanges under the impact of the USA 
recession.

Now I want to know that whether aforesaid attitude of the aforesaid Renowned 
Advocates Firm claiming UN-AVAILABILITY of the Counsel leading to the 
Petitioner� are professional misconduct or not?

Milap Choraria


Reply via email to