Please do not forward these type to me Kpmathur
--- On Fri, 23/1/09, S. K. Jain <[email protected]> wrote: From: S. K. Jain <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: Challenging illegal orders of CIC and SIC in High Courts To: [email protected], [email protected] Date: Friday, 23 January, 2009, 11:04 PM No Kapoor Sahab, kyo kya aapko samazh mein nahi aa raha hai ? Once again Extra Ordinary Highly Talented Shri 1008 IC Anugraha Narayan Tiwari ji is helping them and feel relaxed. I am going to appeal to Hounourable President of United States of America in Washington DC and Honourable Russian President in Moscow to appoint him in International Court of Justice or United Nation. Under Geneva Convention they have every access to his excellent credentials with distinction as he has been to both the countries and carries great Harvard fame too. High Court or Supreme Court is to small for Respectable Sir Ji. Also you should know Ambani brothers too are also from Stanford and Harvard but their father who built vast empire was not highly educated. This is true education, Its not hypothetical but in real. Respectable Sir Ji needs to be honoured as decisions are unmatchable on planet earth. In the Mughal era, In the court of Akbar The Great, there were 9 jewels and Respectable Sir Ji is Kohinoor from Andhra Pradesh. In reality Kohinoor was extracted from Golconda mines in Andhra Pradesh. In the the entire world there was only one Kohinoor. Ghat Ghat ka pani piya hai Sir ne and is the Best in the world. I am wondering where Guiness Book of Records people have vanished to view Sir Ji's decisions. It highly unfair on their part that his expertise at International level is not utilized. S. K. Jain At 11:15 PM 1/22/2009, Satish Kumar Kapoor wrote: >IC ANT is notorious in favouring PIO/CPIO. > >S.K.Kapoor > >--- On Fri, 1/23/09, sroy1947 ><<mailto:sroy1947% 40yahoo.com>sroy1...@yahoo. com> wrote: > >From: sroy1947 <<mailto:sroy1947% 40yahoo.com>sroy1...@yahoo. com> >Subject: [rti_india] Re: Challenging illegal orders of CIC and SIC >in High Courts >To: <mailto:rti_ india%40yahoogro ups.com>rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com >Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 6:49 AM > >Hi, > >The K.Lall decision is only on the website of CIC (published after 1 >year) because I exposed it. It is a completely illegal decision >delivered by IC(ANT) to shield the Registrar of Companies whose >records are in a mess. Corporate scandals like Satyam come about >because of decisions like these where information is not permitted to >be disclosed to citizens. > >The answer is not to challenge these in High Courts but before Full >Benches of the Commissions. IC(ANT)'s 7(3) "further fees to be >determined by CPIO" is listed before Full Bench on 24-Feb-2009 - I >have got a hearing notice (for information) on this. Hopefully they >will hear me too. > >The K.Lall incident is a graphic case of misguided senior citizens - >habitual and frivolous RTIers - who dont show up for hearings - >allowing ICs to pass these anti-citizen orders. In any case the K.Lall >decision was drafted by the "winning" Respondent P/A. This group is on >the job to rectify / overturn K.Lall - be patient. > >HERE IS WHAT IC T is shielding RoC from >"Ministry makes a mess of key papers filed by 150000 firms" ><http://www.livemint>http://www.livemint .com/2009/ 01/04234154/ >Ministry- makes-a-mess- of-key-p. html > >The "Responsible RTI Code" can be found on our homepage ><http://groups.>http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/rti_ india > >Sarbajit >B.E.(Hons) BITS Pilani > >--- In rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com, sanjiva dayal <sanjivadayal@ ...> wrote: > > > > Dear Sarabjit, > > 1. > > Kindly see the following order of CIC which is on the CIC website >www.cic.gov. in:- > > K. Lall Vs. Ministry of Company Affairs (Appeal >No.CIC/AT/A/ 2007/00112; Date of Decision: 12.4.2007). > > Kindly comment whether this order is against the provisions of RTI >Act or not. Using this order, CPIO of Registrar of Companies is not >providing any information about Companies. > > 2. > > Scam relates to providing housing loan against fictitious properties >on the basis of fake documents by Banks. > > 3. > > What is your Responsible RTI Code? > > > > Sanjiva Dayal, B.Tech.(I.I. T. Kanpur) > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
