Dear All,

I came across an article on ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN
MÉXICO which I felt like sharing with the forum. The news is old, and I 
apologize, if it has already been circulated on the forum.

Allan R. Brewer-Carías
Professor, Central University of Venezuela

1. I began to write this presentation during the days of the Inauguration of 
President Barack Obama, and as I was asked by John Ackerman to refer in a 
comparative perspective to the matter of access to information and transparency 
in Mexico, I thought that it would be interesting to highlight what a new 
President in the U.S. was proposing on the subject.

And effectively, on his first day in office last month (February 21, 2009), 
President Obama said, referring to the Government, that “For a long time now, 
there has been too much secrecy in this city,” expressing that on the contrary, 
“Transparency and rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency.” He 
then ordered that: “Starting today every agency and department should know that 
this administration stands on the side not of those who seek to withhold 
information, but those who seek to make it known.”

2. For such purposes that same day he issued two presidential Memoranda, one on 
the “Freedom of In-formation Act,” and the other on “Transparency and Open 
Government. “

Quoting Justice Louis Brandeis who referred to the “SUNLIGHT” as “THE BEST OF 
DISINFECTANTS,” Obama ordered the Freedom of Information Act to be administered 
with a clear presumption ”in favor of disclosure”, in the sense that “in the 
face of doubt, openness prevails,” so in general, “The Government should not 
keep information confidential.” In the second Memorandum, the President 
affirmed that his “Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented 
level of openness in Government” considering that “openness will strengthen our 
democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government,” adding that: 
“Government should be transparent. Transparency promotes accountability and 
provides information for citizens about what their Government is doing.”

3. This whole concept of transparency in Government responds to the political 
idea of the “the crystal house” image (la maison de verre), that after so many 
years of opacity began to be developed, associated with the symbolism of the 
visible and accessible, in contrast to what is closed, mysterious, inaccessible 
or inexplicable; being transparency related to the sense of tranquility and 
serenity that results from what can be dominated or rationalized, in contrast 
to the anguish and perturbation caused by what is mysterious or unknown.

4. This concept of transparency has been one of the key elements that in the 
evolution of Public Administration has helped the 
transformation of the traditional Bureaucratic State into the current 
Democratic Administrative State of our times, more devoted to citizens than to 
the King or to the bureaucracy. That Bureaucratic State was the one 
characterized by Max Weber as an organization seeking “to increase the 
professional knowledge superiority of public officials precisely by means of 
secret and of the secrecy of their intentions.”


1. Paper written for comments in the Conference on ”Challenges to State Reform 
in Mexico: Transparency, Elections & criminal Justice,” organized by the 
Institute of Latin American Studies, Columbia University and Instituto de 
Investigaciones Jurídicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Columbia 
University, New York, 19-20 January, 2009.
2.  Speech at the swearing-in ceremony for Senior Officials of the Executive 
Office, February 21, 2009. See the report of Sheryl Gay Stolberg “On First Day, 
Obama Quickly Sets a New Tone”, The New York Times, February 22, 2009, p. A1
3. January 21, 2009. Presidencial Memoranda, in www.whitehouse.gov
4. Jaime Rodríguez-Arana, “La transparencia en la Administración Pública,” in 
Revista Vasca de Administración Pública, n° 42, Oñati 1995, p. 452




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to