Mr Nangia,
 
While appreciating the views presented by you, I would like to put up a few 
points of my own-
1. No where have I claimed any kind of originality in the story
2. It is not for the author but the others to decide whether it is worth 
reading or not
3. RTI India is not only for news but is certainly more about views. It seems 
you might have missed the crux, but the main emphasis was upon the relevance of 
section 197 CrPC
4. It is not that write-ups on old topics already in public domain do not come 
up. Very often they are heavily dependent on the facts already in circulation. 
If someone tries to implement your yardsticks in all spheres, atleast half the 
write-ups will die down
5. I would reiterate that the emphasis was on section 197 CrPC though it was 
introduced at a somwhat later stage
 
Dr Nutan Thakur


--- On Mon, 6/15/09, suresh nangia <[email protected]> wrote:


From: suresh nangia <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [rti_india] The Lavalin Case- Rethinking over section 197 CrPC
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Monday, June 15, 2009, 12:51 PM







Dr Nutan
 
     The information shared by you through this piece of writing is already in 
public domain for a long time now and much has already been written & debated 
about this. In fact, this has been the cause  behind the inner party tussle 
going on within CPM and Kerala Chief Minister being slighted by the party 
leadership for his being in favour of Mr Vijayan being prosecuted. In fact, 
State Governer has already given his okay in the matter.We find nothing new in 
your write up.
 
     Unless there is something new and newsworkth to share, there is no point 
in circulating stale stories and posting these on rtiboard
 
    S K NANGIA      

--- On Thu, 11/6/09, Nutan Thakur <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Nutan Thakur <[email protected]>
Subject: [rti_india] The Lavalin Case- Rethinking over section 197 CrPC
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, 11 June, 2009, 7:32 PM










Pinarayi Vijayan is the state Secretary of the Kerala CPI(M) and is also the 
member of the Central Polit bureau, which is the highest decision making body 
of the Party. The 19th Congress of the CPI(M) had elected a 87 member Central 
Committee, which on April 03, 2008 elected a 15 Member Polit Bureau. Pinarayi 
Vijayan is a member of both these. The other members of this Polit Bureau 
include such stalwarts as the General Secretary Prakash Karat along with his 
wife Brinda, Sitaram Yechury, Biman Basu, Manik Sarkar, the two CPI(M) Chief 
ministers Buddhadev Bhattacharya and V S Achuthanandan along with others. He is 
thus among the most important members of the CPI)M).
The so-called Lavalin case relates to memorandum of understanding (MoU) Kerala 
State Electricity Board (KSEB) signed with SNC-Lavalin, a Canadian company in 
August 1995. During the initial period of the contract, G. Karthikeyan of the 
Congress Party was the Minister for Electricity. Later during further contracts 
in February 1997 Pinarai Vijayan was the Minister for Electricity.
Later the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) found that Lavalin was 
only a consultant intermediary and not the original equipment manufacturer and 
that the supply of goods and services was made by other firms at a much higher 
cost leading to excess expenditure. According to the CAG, various avoidable 
(and at times deliberate) failures on the part of the Board and the government 
to properly execute the deal resulted in heavy losses to the government of an 
amount nearly Rs 25 crores. On 16 January 2007, Kerala High Court ordered a CBI 
enquiry into the scandal. On February 19, 2008, the CBI informed High court of 
Kerala that the investigation was progressing and hinted at the complicity of 
former Electricity Ministers Pinarayi Vijayan and G. Karthikeyan. On 21 January 
2009, the CBI filed a progress report on the investigation in the Kerala High 
Court where it named Pinarayi Vijayan as the 9th accused. A total of 11 persons 
have been arraigned.
 As per CBI's version Vijayan, while serving as Electricity Minister between 
May 1996 and October 1998, colluded with K. Mohanachandran, Principal Secretary 
(Power) in a criminal conspiracy already in motion in the matter of awarding 
supply contracts of the projects to Lavalin. The investigations revealed that 
the supply contract for renovation and modernisation of the Panniyar, Shengulam 
and Pallivasal hydel projects was given to SNC Lavalin at an exorbitant rate 
and the per MW cost for the same was the highest. This caused a loss to the 
Government of Kerala with corresponding wrongful. Thus CBI requested an order 
for prosecuting Vijayan. 
Thus came the question of Prosecution. As per our statues, section 197 of the 
Code of Criminal Procedure deals with prosecution of Judges and public 
servants. Section 197(1) states that when any person who is or was a Judge or 
Magistrate or a public servant not removable from his office save by or with 
the sanction of the Government is accused of any offence alleged to have been 
committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his 
official duty no court shall take cognizance of such offence except with the 
previous sanction of the concerned government.
There are two important Supreme Court judgements in this regards, both exactly 
opposite to each other. While in the state of Uttar Pradesh vs. Paras Nath 
Singh, the Supreme Court has ruled that a public servant cannot be given the 
protection of sanction under Section 197 CrPC if he is facing allegations of 
indulging in criminal offences. The Court said that forgery, criminal 
conspiracy, cheating and taking gratification cannot form part of official 
discharge of duty by a public servant saying-''A public servant, however, is 
not entitled to indulge in criminal activities,' '. The apex court also noted, 
"It is no part of the duty of a public servant while discharging his official 
duties to commit forgery of the type covered by the aforesaid offences. Want of 
sanction under Section 197 of the code is therefore no bar." At the same time, 
in another case related to some senior police officers of Maharashtra another 
bench of the SC had held the prosecution of
 these officers under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) 
illegal, on the ground that the accused cannot be prosecuted without proper 
prior sanction.
The CPI (M) leadership and the workers, both at the Center and in the state of 
Kerala have refused to take this prosecution lightly decided to fight it out. 
While the Press Statement in its statement dated June 8, 2009 said that the CBI 
case "is politically motivated" and that "it is unfortunate that the Governor 
of Kerala decided to grant permission to the Central Bureau of Investigation to 
initiate prosecution proceedings" , the workers on the street took the message 
wholeheartedly and went for a heavy rampage and large-scale ransacking and 
violence. Previously Vijayan had also issued threats of retaliation and 
punishment to K. Gopalakrishnan, Editor, Mathrubhumi Malayalam for having 
played a lead role in exposing and pursuing the Lavlin case.
Thus all these efforts are being made to save a person who is primarily being 
seen as an accomplish in a criminal case where he has supposedly misused his 
official position to cause heavy losses to the State exchequer. This from a 
party that has always boasted of belonging to the toiling masses- the workers 
and the peasants. But more important than the individuals, it is the basic 
legal postulate that I want to harp upon. Do we really need section 197 of the 
CrPC? Isn't this provision of law being misused persistently or is being used 
selectively for political ends? For the same criminal acts, the governments and 
the authorities go by different yardsticks. Against some they grant the 
prosecution sanction while for others they withhold it for years.
>From all this, it seems that this provision of section 197 CrPC is primarily 
>being misused or is being used for specific purposes. At least, it shall be 
>scrapped for cases related with forgery, misappropriation, cheating, misuse of 
>official positions for wrongful gains etc. This is something that is 
>immediately required.

Dr Nutan Thakur
Editor,
Nutan Satta Pravah
Lucknow

















Cricket on your mind? Visit the ultimate cricket website. Enter now!


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to