Shri Kalia : In our country, we can achieve nothing except by "satyagrahas" and agitations. Representations to the Government or to the Commissions will not lead us anywhere . If someone is committing mistakes after mistakes, he muist be restrained - the earlier the better - in the interest of citizens.
Dr Arun Agrawal > > My dear Dr Arun Agarwal and Sarabjit, > > I agree, but our problem is, that he was also an activist like u and me. > > Should we start agitation against such decision or should we have patience > for some. > > However my own opinion is to start. > > Your comments please. > N.N.Kalia > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Arun Agrawal [email protected]: > > > > > > > > > I do not share the opinion that IC(SG) is a joker . This would > > tantamount to abusing his Office publicly . He is a very knowledgeable > > person on RTI issues and is disposing off appeals pretty fast . > > > > Although in one of my 2nd Appeals, he did do a great deal of injustice > > to me . I had proposed that the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, > > Delhi appoint a single point CPIO in terms of DoPT directions, instead > > of me chasing and getting varying response on the same RTI application > > from a dozen PIOs . That was not considered worthy of being taken note > > of. > > > > I had also urged that the PIOs had stated that they did not have the > > required information, but had asked me to come and collect the > > information by myself by inspecting hundreds of files . > > > > He took no note of that either, refusing to take my argument as to how I > > was to know which PIO had responded and which one had not , and that the > > response was evasive. > > > > Another IC , Ms Annapurna Dixit on 16.6.2009 dealt with a similar case , > > Bimal Khemani v/s BSNL in a different manner . She directed that BSNL > > collate the information asked for by the appellant from different > > Circles/Training Centres and then forward it to the appellant in one go > > instead of asking the Training Centres/Circles to provide the > > information to Mr Khemani directly . > > > > Dr Arun Agrawal > > > > In this decision, IC(SG) proceeds to make a series of ignorant boo-boos > > concerning third party rights. > > > > Now the RTI Act clearly specifies that third parties are to be allowed > > opportunity of hearing at every stage. For example > > > > "19(4) If the decision of the Central Public Information Officer or > > State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, against which an > > appeal is preferred relates to information of a third party, the Central > > Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may > > be, shall give a reasonable opportunity of being heard to that third > > party." > > > > > > Instead this corrupt idiot (we all know now why he is an I.C.), > > proceeds to opine that third parties like Co-op Societies should be shut > > out of appeal hearings. > > > > > > "The FAA's practice of calling societies during hearings is completely > > undesirable and must be stopped immediately..." > > > > > > Why oh why does Mr Habibullah assign such important P/As to this > > joker? Give him Agriculture and Fisheries instead. > > > > > > Sarbajit > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
