Dear All, This is NOT a "VOTE" but a "DEBATE". You must DEFEND/PROVE your case by submitted arguments as well as the PIO is expected to defend or "prove" his case by 19(5).
Sarbajit PS: This exercise shall hopefully make our members better prepared for the CIC/SIC appeal process - where our "opinions" are often doused with "fact". "OPINION: a personal belief or judgment that is not founded on proof or certainty" "FACT: a concept whose truth can be proved" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact_(law) --- In [email protected], Trivendra <trivendra.sha...@...> wrote: > > "FOR" > > Trivendra > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:45 PM, sroy1947 <sroy1...@...> wrote: > > > > > > > Topic: > > > > "This House believes that the 'CIC Management Regulations, 2007' have no > > basis/force in law, and 'inter alia' contravene/dilute the parent "RTI Act > > 2005" and the duly notified Rules published by Central Government thereunder > > to the detriment of citizens" > > > > Proposed by > > Sarbajit Roy > > "FOR" the motion > > > > Kindly identify yourself as "FOR" or "AGAINST" the motion while setting out > > your case. > > > > If there is insufficient representation for any "side", the Moderators > > shall "honour" 1 or 2 "Devils advocates". > > > > If there is insufficient participation in this and other future debates - > > the Moderators shall dissolve this group. > > > > Reference Material: > > http://cic.gov.in/CIC%20Regulations,%202007.pdf > > http://cic.gov.in/rti-act.htm > > http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Notifications/CIC%20Appeal%20Rules.pdf > > > > > > > > > > -- > Try to be part of solution. It will add your value > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
