Sir, I am against CIC's move for following reasons 1. CIC's action is ultra-virus to the RTI 2. Objective of CIC should be to deliver speedy verdict instead of hapering the matter for what so ever reasons. 3. The money involved in organising such "Conventions" / "Conferences", is wastage of public resources which CIC could have used otherwise in better ways. 4. How CIC is going to compensate the time is not specified.
Regards Trivendra Lucknow On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:10 PM, sroy1947 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Topic: > > "This House believes that the Central Information Commission is squandering > public funds & exceeding its power and functions (as defined in Chapter V of > the RTI Act, 2005) by organizing annual "Conventions" / "Conferences", > whilst neglecting its statutory duties (which are strictly limited to > disposing of Complaints, Appeals, the awarding of penalties, and preparing > an annual report per the Act)." > > Proposed by > Sarbajit Roy > "FOR" the motion > > Notes: > 1) Kindly identify yourself as "FOR" or "AGAINST" the motion while setting > out your case. > > 2) Kindly add to / modify the arguments already listed up till the time you > post. > > 3) Kindly ensure that your contributions to the arguments are supported > with some basis (either in "law" or in "fact"). Cite these as footnotes to > your post. > > 4) Kindly do not vandalise / delete existing contributions of other > members. > > 5) Use the previous Active Debates, as a guide to what we can achieve > together. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rti_india/message/4360 > > > -- Try to be part of solution. It will add your value [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
