Dear All,
Find herewith   CPIO, Home Dept, New Delhi refusing the property details of IPS 
officers, names of
defaulting IPS officers  . Informed me to approach Mah Govt Home Dept. Mah Govt 
 Home Dept despite repeated RTI do not reply to RTI Appln dtd  11.6.09 , 1st 
Appl dtd6.8.09   & possibility of 2nd Appl filed on  14.9.09  is remote as  Mah 
SIC adjourned scheduled hearing on  & made scapegoat City Engineer, Mumbai 
Corpn. 
It may be noted that 2nd Appl about MCGM officer’s property declaration was 
scheduled on 15.6.2009, and I was informed by Infn Commissioner as matter about 
property declaration is sub judice , he would not take any stand on whether I 
should be given Prty Decln of City Engr of MCGM & hence I was not allowed to 
put forth my arguments. Shri Kale  ( City Engr) has objected to furnish me his  
prty decln.
I had sought for CERTIFIED COPIES from Mah SIC and got the copies  & seeking 
again the  letter dtd. 5.9.2008( mentioned by IC RT in his order 28.7.09 ) .
 Kindly feel free to contact me for further details. 
 Regards
 vihar  
 
 
 Note:  Shortly, future course of action  after consulting RTI Activists ( on 
MCGM Prty Decln & Section 4 order IC RT  31.7.2009) 
****************
 
!) CPIO, Home Dept, New Delhi refusing the property details of IPS officers, 
names of
defaulting IPS officers
 http://www.box.net/shared/u42cbtf67e
 
http://www.box.net/shared/um3dm0elfk
  
2) RTI Appln to Home Dept, New Delhi, dtd  10.8.09 
 
http://www.box.net/shared/zapr50qv34
 
3) Mah SIC adjouned scheduled hearing on  & made scapegoat City Engineer, 
Mumbai Corpn.( denies prty decln, way ahead shortly) 
 
http://www.box.net/shared/rue75k1ct6
  
http://www.box.net/shared/piu5u8zn6f
  
4)  Mah IPS officers  prty decln 2nd Appl filed on  14.9.09
  
http://www.box.net/shared/n77klvsg25
 
 
5) Mah SIC adjourned scheduled hearing on  his own prty decln  11..6.09 
 
http://www.box.net/shared/374gtktvi6
 
**************
 
 


      Add whatever you love to the Yahoo! India homepage. Try now! 
http://in.yahoo.com/trynew

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to