Hello Venkatesh and others on this list. Am getting back after a few years in 
the boondocks, and hope to be 'active" by December this year again. A few of my 
early RTIs, on definition of Minorities, ambit of tolls and exemptions on 
public roads, definition of Muslim Citizen of India, and a few others are going 
to be resumed.

But more importantly, I had asked two of the active seekers of the Truth in 
India through RTI, the Catholic Church in all its glory and the Protesant 
Church of England which may include our friends at CHRI, to come clean 
themselves on adhering to the letter, chapter and verse of RTI.

This clarion call by Venkatesh is as good a time as any to look around and see 
if those who cast a stone are in the first case free of guilt themselves? 
Would, for example, Section 7(3) or equivalent be applicable also to Russel 
Square in London as well as to The Secretarium in Rome?

Veeresh Malik

ps: is there, perhaps, yet another link between Kobad Ghandy and CHRI, as is 
being suggested in certain quarters? And does it go back to London days in the 
'60s?

Reply via email to