Dear Friend Ahya, We would appreciate if you kindly do not attempt to teach our venerable group founding member Rtiadvicer how to suck eggs. The 2 decisions you are refering are not even remotely relevant for appointment of CCIC. Since you were also arrested with Shri Krishnaraj Rao it is presumed you are one of the jokers Learned advicer refers.
http://openarchive.in/judis/14606.htm http://openarchive.in/judis/10326.htm Both your old (1996) cases are about non-promotion, regularisation of casuals and scheduled caste quota discrimination. The settled status of 16(1) is there must be equal opportunity for appointment to any office ||UNDER|| the State. The best decsions date from the 1960's - like "Krishan Chandra Nagar" S D Sharma :---------- Sunil Ahya <sunila...@...> sunila...@... wrote Dear Friend, Quote: Article 12. Definition."In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires, "the State" includes the Government and Parliament of India and the Government and the Legislature of each of the States and all local or other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India. Unquote Some SC Judgments: (i) Appointments made only on the basis of notification put up on notice board without any advertisements in newspapers, without inviting applications from open market and from employment exchange are stage managed by authorities in flagrant breach of Article 14 & 16.[Ashwani Kumar Vs State of BiharAIR 1996 SC2833] (ii) Right to seek appointment to a Post under Article 14 read with Article 16(1)& (4) is a Constitutional right to equality......... [Jai Narain ram Vs State of UP, AIR 1996, SC 703] Warm Regards, Sunil Ahya. On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:15 AM, rti advice <rtiadv...@...> wrote: Dear Sarbajit This is about the PIL which some RTI activists from Maharashtra have filed in our High Court. The filing reference is WP(C)12918 with CMM 13793 of 2009 "Krishna Rao &Ors vs UOI and Ors" You should track this case because copy was forwarded to me for my informal perusal by one of the Resp. The drafting of this WP is abysmal and is the usual publicity seeking PILs tangoing with my party on behalf of Ansari. The case hasn't been registered as yet due to filing defects and is not yet available via Courtnic. Since our old friend PB is going to be appearing for these clowns at the next hearing, would you educate the RTI group that Art. 16 which these activists strongly rely on is for public appointments UNDER (he-he) the State ? -- It is not always the same thing to be a good man and a good citizen - Aristotle
