Dear Sarbajit, You need not have to arouse the Shri Aurobindo college people. They are getting adequate counselling & protection from elsewhere.
According to (unconfirmed soucres) a stay has been granted to these suspicious orders of SG. Seems KKN shall have to defend it once again much to his consternation. http://bit.ly/5jqYLh Sidharth On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:36 PM, sarbajitr <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Dear Sidharth > > I am always in a mood to discuss <wink> > > On Monday I shall get in touch with Aurobindo College and rouse them into > action. In any case CIC can only penalise PIOs. The question of section 4 > compliance doesn't arise for non-PAs irrespective of some error of fact/law > they have fallen into. > > I also find it highly suspicious (on Monday my CIC sources will confirm that > corruption is involved - and who) that IC(SG) gets a complaint on 12.Nov.2009 > and conducts a hearing on 24.11.2009. On my own DDA section 4 compliance case > Mr Habibullah took 4 years to schedule the hearing and then it took him 3 > hearings (assisted by another COmmissioner) to take cognisance of my > complaint u/s 18(2) - no penalties as yet. > > I, King Sarbajit, do hereby dub thee RTI-Expert the 3rd. > > Sarbajit > >
