Oops, I clarify that I do not classify Commodore L.Batra in category of those who get work done in CIC.
I had included his name as an example of another person whose emails the CIC has taken cognisance of. Sarbajit --- In [email protected], "sarbajitr" <sroy1...@...> wrote: > > Hi > > I am Sarbajit (one who has conquered everything) > > Funnily, this question was put to me too by the CIC when I sent my email > complaint. I explained to them as follows:- > > a) That "complaints" form the heart of the CIC's 'Soo-moto" powers - see > 18(2). > > b) That inquiry into "complaints" take precedence over disposal of appeals > per the scheme of the RTI Act. > > c) That there is no provision in the RTI Act to restrict in any way the form, > nature or content of a complaint to the Commission (unlike appeals). > > d) That I did not recognise the CIC's illegal Management Regulations which > were drafted and approved by idiots (ie, legally deficient morons). > > e) That whereas the duly notified rules for APPEALS to the CIC provided for > "verification" (which requires a signature), there is no such requirements > for complaints - which can be unsigned (and hence do not require a digital / > electronic signature to be sent over email). > > f) That I demanded parity with Ms Aruna Roy, Commodre Lokesh Batra, Mr > Shekhar Singh etc who regularly use emails to get their work done at CIC > through Mr Habibullah. > > Sarbajit >
