Good step taken by Mr. Gandhi.

It clearly shows Government's "frivolous and vexatious" intention of bringing 
unwarranted changes to act in the grab of  strengthening the Act

Cheers,
Kapil
 



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Anil kumar 
  To: [email protected] ; RTI4EMPOWERMENT ; rti4ngo ; 
antibriberycampaign 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 8:34 AM
  Subject: [rti_india] Fw: [kria] Angry Information Commissioner releases 
minutes of RTI meeting on Act amendments


    


        --- On Tue, 2/2/10, S.K.Rajendran <[email protected]> wrote:

        Source: http://www.hindu. com/2010/ 02/02/stories/ 2010020254951100 .htm

        Angry Information Commissioner releases minutes of RTI meeting on Act
        amendments

        Government seems disrespectful in treating October meeting as a 
non-event:
        Shailesh Gandhi

        At meeting, majority of 60-odd Commissioners vetoed amendments proposed 
by
        DoPT

        Meeting concluded on understanding that DoPT would forward minutes to 
the
        Commissioners

        NEW DELHI: The minutes of the stormy October 14, 2009 meeting between
        Central and State Information Commissioners and the Department of 
Personnel
        and Training (DoPT) on the controversial issue of amendments to the 
Right To
        Information Act, 2005 are now available for the common citizen to see.

        Among other things, the DOPT proposed amendments to exclude from the Act
        "frivolous and vexatious" complaints as well as "discussions/ 
consultations"
        (previously known as file notings) preceding a government decision.

        Curiously, the minutes were released on Monday, not by the Union 
Ministry of
        Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension of which the DoPT is a part 
but by
        Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi. Mr. Gandhi resorted 
to the
        extreme step after being repeatedly fobbed off by the DoPT on the 
release of
        the minutes.

        The October 14 meeting concluded on the understanding that the DoPT 
would
        forward the recorded minutes to the Information Commissioners (ICs). At 
the
        meeting, the majority of the 60-odd ICs entirely vetoed the idea of
        amendments, and only two officers agreed on the need to exclude 
"frivolous
        and vexatious" complaints.

        Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Gandhi said the minutes formed an important 
part
        of the record on the proposed amendments. In the event that the 
government
        went ahead with the amendments, the minutes would prove that it had 
done so
        by overruling the ICs. Mr. Gandhi said he and another IC, Satyanand 
Mishra,
        sent several reminders to the DoPT to no avail.

        Ten days ago, he wrote an e-mail to Shantanu Consul, Secretary of the 
DoPT,
        in which Mr. Gandhi told him that it was disrespectful to the 
institution of
        ICs if a meeting with "over 50 per cent of Information Commissioners 
across
        the country" was treated so casually.

        "I told him that the Government seemed to want to treat the meeting as a
        non-event," Mr. Gandhi said.

        When even this step did not produce the desired result, he went ahead 
and
        released his own recorded minutes of the meeting.

        Mr. Gandhi's minutes show that Union Minister for Personnel, Public
        Grievances and Pension Prithiviraj Chavan proposed seven amendments in 
all,
        arguing that these were needed to "strengthen the Act." The ICs pointed 
out
        that five of these required change of rules at best and not full-fledged
        amendments. The other two proposals were vetoed by all ICs present 
barring
        two. 
       



  

Reply via email to