Hi, Thanks for everybody's response.
I will take the suggetions of Dr Arun and Sanju. In fact Sanju has already solved the problem in a wonderful way. In his words : =============================== In my RTIs I leave the address field blank and in the application include some statement like 'Attached is the Postal order, number XXXXXXX. Since I am not sure of the designation of the appropriate CPIO, I have left the address blank in the Postal order. The application may be kindly be addressed to the designated PIO". It has worked without hassles till now. Sanju =========================================== This is a great learning for me. Thanks everybody. Niladri --- In [email protected], "Arun" <arun_agra...@...> wrote: > > > Postal Orders are most convenient forms of payment for such applications > .Regretfully, most of the PAs do not specify in whose favour such IPOs > are tobe made out . > Recently I sent a query to Passport Office, Ghaziabad , making the IPO > payable toPIO, Passport Officer > This was returned ( thankfully ! ) with the remarks, some 21 days later, > that theIPO be made payable to Passport Officer . > I feel that the best way to get around this problem is not to specify > the payee's nameon the IPO > Dr Arun Agrawal > > > --- In [email protected], "niladri_shekhar_das_in" > <niladri_shekhar_das_in@> wrote: > > > > Dear Members, > > > > A simple question. Can we use Court Fee Stamps in all RTIs instead of > Postal Orders. > > > > The reason why I am asking this question is that my RTI to WCD was > returned back as the Postal Order was addressed to "Public Information > Officer, Ministry of Women and Child Development". > > > > They requested me to resend the RTI with a Postal Order addressed to > "Pay and Accounts Officer, Ministry of Women and Child Development". > > > > Could I have avoided this hassle, by using a 10/- Court Fee Stamp at > the very first instance. > > > > Thanks in Advance > > > > Niladri > > >
