Dear Manoj

Assume that both statements are substantially true.

Insofar as the other points are concerned - you cannot see the wood because of 
the trees.

Sarbajit

--- In [email protected], MANOJ KAMRA <kamra...@...> wrote:
>
> Dear Sarbajit Roy ji,
> Â 
> Â Â Â Â Â In the reply, you have selected one link "what we do" ---showing 
> entire funding by Ministery of Rural development(GoI). In yet another link, 
> "about CCDU"---showing funding by GoI and UNISEF. On asking for PIO,they 
> claim complete exemption telephonically (although I sent RTI application) and 
> subsequently SIC will decide.
> Â 
> Secondly, their four consultants and seven regional support units and 
> various activities as claimed on website need RTI-disclosure as at Bikaner 
> no such unit is in actual working as claimed on website.
> Â 
> As far as ADB is concerned, it has been sanctioning ODIUS loans (for projects 
> imposed by ruling govt). In 2000, one infrastructure project  of 1500 
> crores(@9.5% interest rate when our banking industry was lending at 5%) 
> was sancitoned. For not timely consumption of loan,commitment charges of 36 
> crores (as per audit report) were borne by state govt in phase-I DUE TO 
> CONSULTANTS IMPOSED BY ADB. 
> Â 
> and just two years back , another 1500 crores infrastructure proejct has been 
> sanctioned and their is very dismal progress leading to heavy commitment 
> charges .Enlisted (in ADB) Consultanting firms with approval of false CV 
> (WITHOUT SUPPORTING EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATE AS IN CV) is the main cause of 
> delay,inefficient design,supervision defeating purpose of loan.Same problem 
> was during Satyendra Dubey murder (by substituting experts by novices with 
> false CV just after getting consultancy contracts).
> Â 
> Kindly suggest how to disclose actual experience of experts(actually 
> subsituted novices)Â having very heavy CV (in 4-7 pages) WITHOUT ANY 
> SUPPORTING EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATEÂ as per CV.
> Â 
> With regards
> Manoj K.Kamra
> --- On Sun, 4/18/10, sarbajitr <sroy1...@...> wrote:
> 
> 


Reply via email to