According to DoPT, "civil society" constitutes only NGO's. Some of the results of those group discussions are laughable. Even DoPT itself has not implemented most of them, including Sec 4 (1)(a) !
RTIwanted --- On Mon, 4/19/10, sarbajitr <[email protected]> wrote: Well, from DoPT's document, Maja Daruwala didn't speak at all there. In any case, I have just sent an email to Secy DoPT that consultations with what is half of the NCPRI working committee can hardly be deemed to be consultation with "all civil society" (list attached) as they claim. AND CERTAINLY NOT AS A BASIS FOR AMENDING RTI ACT in a hurry without public consultation !!!. Sarbajit
