Dear Bunch

Is there something about the term "Cross-Posting" which is not clear to you ? 
FYI, it means we don't want to know what is transpiring on other mailing lists.

Please don't confuse the members of this list - this is NOT great news. Among 
other things, it is a poorly reasoned judgement to get matters stalled in the 
Supreme Court. The lead case is already there with the Orissa High Court's 
judgement against Reliance Energy in SLP - and there are now going to be a 
string of these private / NGO cases getting in on the fast track for a 
"lifetime stay" to SC.

Sarbajit


--- In [email protected], raja bunch <bunch_r...@...> wrote:
>
> Its great news.
> Bunch
> 
> ________________________________
> From: NCPRI India <ncpri.in...@...>
> Sent: Wed, 21 April, 2010 10:44:32 AM
> Subject: [ncprimailinglist] NGOs getting public funds come within purview of 
> RTI Act:
> 
> Â  
> 
> 
> http://www.zeenews. com/news620686. html
> 
> 
> NGOs getting public funds come within purview of RTI Act: 
> Delhi HC 
> 
> 
> Updated on Tuesday, April 20, 2010, 20:52 IST
> 
> New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has held that non-governmental organisations 
> which get government funds come within the purview of RTI Act making it 
> mandatory for them to disclose information pertaining to their functioning. 
> 
> "The term public authority has been given a broad and wide meaning not only 
> to include bodies which are owned, controlled or substantially financed 
> directly or indirectly by the government but even non-government 
> organisations, which are substantially financed directly or indirectly by the 
> government," Justice Sanjeev Khanna said while declaring the stock exchanges 
> as public authorities. 
> 
> The court said it is not necessary that the government should have pervasive 
> and deep control over an organisation to bring it under the purview of the 
> transparency act. 
> 
> "Even private organisations, which are enjoying benefit of substantial 
> funding directly or indirectly from the governments, fall within the 
> definition of public authorities under the Act," the court said.  
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> National Campaign for People's Right to Information
> Email: ncpri.india@ gmail.com
> www.righttoinformat ion.info
>


Reply via email to