1) What the locus of Applicant to file this request is not clear ? Considering that he works for a competitor - 8(1)(d) is prima facie applicable.
2) Which procedures followed by CIC violate provisions of the RTI *Act* ??? 3) Why does the CIC take notice of a decision of Jharkhand High Court ?? Sarbajit --- In [email protected], C K Jam <rtiwan...@...> wrote: > > > Another (in a long list) order favoring IIMA. > > IC SG "reserved" his orders after the first hearing. > > Then the matter was sent to a division bench of the CIC consisting of IC SG > and CIC WH. > > > The order is finally out and is attached to this post. > It is still not available on the CIC website. > > The > appellant has now sought a review on various grounds since the procedure > followed by the CIC > violates various provisions of the RTI Act itself. > > RTIwanted >
