Dear Sarbajit,
Your clarification regards non-applicability of Indian Evidence Act to
arbitration proceedings is very true. But we also need to recognise the fact
that certain terms and practices defined in this law are used in
non-judicial proceedings as well. For example, the definition of terms such
as 'document', 'public document' and 'private document' hold good even
outside of a court or quasi-judicial proceeding. Similarly the procedure to
issue certified copies of documents is also borrowed from the IE Act. That
procedure does not restrict it to court officers only. It applies to all
public officers including those dealing with land revenue but do not
necessarily apply only to a context of litigation.
Thanks
Venkat
 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of sarbajit roy
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 12:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: Dont use RTI Act - Satyanand Mishra


  

Hi Raj,

Not true. Yours is a very common mistake.

The Indian Evidence Act only applies to judicial proceedings in a court or
other body/person which is legally authorised to take evidence (and does not
apply to arbitration proceedings).

Sarbajit



On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Raj <chi_international@
<mailto:[email protected]> yahoo.com> wrote:




If that is the case then Indian Evidence act provides that every public
officer holding a public document shall give a certified copy to any
applicant. Every public officer can now ask the rti applicant to apply under
this alternate procedure and RTI power will be reduced. 

BE AWAKE 



--- In rti_in...@yahoogrou <mailto:rti_india%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com,
"sarbajitr" <sroy1...@...> wrote:
>
> http://www.ptinews.
<http://www.ptinews.com/news/663161_-Don-t-use-RTI-if-other-means-of-getting
-info-open->
com/news/663161_-Don-t-use-RTI-if-other-means-of-getting-info-open-
> 
> 'Don't use RTI if other means of getting info open'
> 
> New Delhi, May 21 (PTI) The Central Information Commission has said RTI
Act should not be used if an alternative process of obtaining information is
available.
> 





Reply via email to