Mr. Ashokji Its a criminal thing out and out,pull all of them in court of law ,of course through police
Regards Subhash Lomte On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Ashok Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear Mr Sarbajit, > > Pls see below information wrt one of my problems. > > "I had requested Kotak Mahindra Bank (KMB) to open an NRE Savings Account > for me. I had also applied for a "Two-Way Sweep (TWS)" with my NRE Account, > which was not provided by the bank. When I enquired, they told me that the > feature was not available for NRE Accounts. I late r came to know that the > feature had always been available with NRE Accounts in KMB. I approached the > Bank for compensation as I had lost almost Rs 50K as interest on my money in > the NRE Account. When the Bank refused, I escalated the matter to the > Banking Ombudsman (BO), New Delhi. In between, I had also approached the > Bank's Nodal Officer, but he too had not accepted my request. > 2. After the Bank refused to agree with my contentions, the BO's office > fixed a conciliatory meeting in RBI in end-May 09. During the meeting, the > Bank officials claimed that I had never asked for the TWS to be made > available to me. They further stated that I had not ticked the required box > in the AOF requesting for this feature. I had, in fact, ticked the required > box in the AOF. The BO asked the Bank to produce the AOF, but the bank off > icials said they had not brought the same. The BO asked them to submit the > AOF to their office by the next day. > 3. The BO closed my complaint under para 13 (c) of the amended BO Scheme > 2006 on the grounds that it required going through extensive oral and > documentary evidence which was not possible under the BO Scheme. > 4. After the conciliation meeting, I requested the BO's office to send a > copy of the AOF submitted by KMB to me also for my confirmation as I > suspected some foul play by the Bank. When the BO's Office refused to give > me a copy of the AOF, I sent an application to RBI under the RTI Act 2005, > asking for a copy of the AOF submitted by the Ba nk. I received the AOF > sometime back and was aghast to see that the AOF submitted by KMB to the > BO's office was a forged document. The signatures on the form were not mine > at all. Also, the signatures of my wife on the form, who was the mandate > holder, had also been forged. > 5. It is very likely that the people in the BO New Delhi's Office are > working in connivance with the Bank officials to ensure that their wrong > doings are covered up. I intend taking the case to its logical conclusion. > Can somebody advise the best way out for me hereafter". > > > In the above matter, I had complained about my forged signatures to the BO, > New Delhi in Fen 2010. They forwarded the complaint to the Department of > Banking Supervision in Feb itself. The DBS sent my complaint to KMB, but I > haven't heard from them since then. On telephone I came to know that the DBS > has recd the reply of KMB, but I have not been told anything. > > I would be grateful if you could please advise me on this. I have sent > another RTI to RBI enquiring a lot of things wrt my complaint's handling by > the BO. Since I did not receive any reply from the CPIO, I have sent an > email, escalating the RTI to the FAA. > > Thanks/Brgds > > AK Anand > > > Dear *rti_india !* Get Yourself a cool, short *[email protected]* Email ID > now!<http://mail.in.com/mails/new_reg.php?utm_source=invite&utm_medium=outgoing> > > >
