Dear Mr. Ashish Kumar, I say again is certainly time for all the ant-national person like Venktesh Nayak of CHRI and other NCPRI also to be expeled from the forum.
http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/SS-08122009-04.pdf Venkatesh Nayak vresus Home Affairs In this recent order IC Susma Singh admonshes Nayak "*In passing, I may also observe that the plea advanced by the appellant that the Manual under reference is mandated to be disclosed u/s 4 (1) (b) of the RTI Act is based on gross misunderstanding and misappreciation of the provisions of RTI Act*. By no stretch of imagination, can it be conceived that this Act would permit disclosure of any information which may adversely impact on India’s security concerns. The provisions of clause (a) of section 8 (1) bears testimony to the security concerns of the law makers. Hence, this plea is misconceived and needs to be discarded." Nayak had asked for the top secret and confidential security manual which contained military plans, vulenarabilities and capabilities of systems, intelligence activities, nuclear programs, cryptology etc. The CPIO had object to giving info because "may, indirectly, reveal the security policy/strategy of the Govt. and if the same falls into the hands of Anti Nation persons, like naxals and other terrorists group, it may compromise the security of India." IC Susma singh fully upheld the view of CPIO. But just think if this matter had been assigned to Shailesh Gandhi he would have given all the information to his NCPRI partner. Previously also this Venkatesh is helping spies and traitors lodged in Tihar jail who had compromised Indian Armys secrets with pen drives and cryptology. Head of CHRI is daughter of a famous Indian general against whom many allegations of spying for Pakistan had surface regulalrly. S D Sharma On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:53 PM, ashish kr1965 <[email protected]>wrote: > Dear group moderators > > I am pleased that the new moderation policy is > evidently quite successful in arresting the menace of > frivolous postings to the group. > > Another development is that the NCPRI members > here now appear reluctant to post on a public frequency > where their puerile logic and "ngo-speak" will > be exposed by the many RTI "experts" here. > > For instance Mr Venkatesh Naik is now posting > on Hum Janenge. Of his 2 recent posts, the first > on the DDA HC decision is plagiarized from the > private legal opinion A.K.Chakravarthy of the C.I.C > put up to the Information Commissioners for > their fortnightly meeting. Somehow NCPRI has > obtained a copy of this (Gandhi-giri :-)) and Mr Naik > has the gall to palm off this work as his own > research (right down to the case law). The second post > of Mr Naik's claims that there is no basis in RTI Act 2005 for the > competent authority to prescribe fees for 2nd appeals. > This betrays a complete disregard (or perhaps ignorance) > for the letter of the law, and I am strongly inclined > towards seconding Sharma's suggestion to expel > NCPRI (and other NGOs) from this group so that our > group members are not deceived.. > > Ashish
