The source of power for all appeal / complaint decisions. "19(8)(a) In its decision, the Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, has the power to REQUIRE the public authority to take ANY SUCH STEPS AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO SECURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ACT,"
It is not a pass the buck strategy. The information has to be disclosed by the P/A anyway and the 3rd party notices, if any, have to be issued by the PIO. Sarb ajit --- In [email protected], "C K" <rtiwan...@...> wrote: > > Typical pass the buck by two ex babus. > They still think they are "administrators" and not like someone performing > quasi judicial functions and hence, like to continue with "pass the buck" > strategy. > > Sarbajit, > > Under which provision of Sec 18, 19, 20 does the Commission have any powers > to remand the matter back to the PIO or for that matter to the FAA, specially > when both of them have already passed orders ? > Decision has to be taken by the Commission, that is why someone has come in > Second Appeal before it. > > RTIwanted > > --- In [email protected], "sarbajitr" <sroy1947@> wrote: > > > > In the last poll we had at this group, our members overwhelmingly voted > > IC(MLS) and IC(ANT) as the 2 best ICs at the CIC. That this duo works magic > > when they sit together is demonstrated by this fantastic > > decision which upholds everything that this group has been saying since > > inception on 3rd parties. > > > > http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/AT-22022010-01.pdf > > P.P.Rajeev versus Cochin Port Trust. > > >
