Dear Moderator 

Please unsubscribe me from the list. 

vikas
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: sarbajitr 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 7:54 AM
  Subject: [rti_india] Re: Habibullah lies again


    
  Dear Boy

  It doesn't need a petition with hundreds of signatures.
  Thee are counter-productive.

  All it needs is 1 (ONE) person to verify the facts
  (using RTI or otherwise by directly sending a letter
  to Mr Habibullah etc) and then file a representation
  to the Central Govt. asking for required enquiry / action.

  Sarbajit

  --- In [email protected], boyonli...@... wrote:
  >
  > Shame once again. This reason it self is enough to start a petition for 
immediate removal of the Janab. It couldn't get more worse from a person at the 
top. 
  > Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
  > 
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: "sarbajitr" <sroy1...@...>
  > Sender: [email protected]
  > Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 17:39:15 
  > To: <[email protected]>
  > Reply-To: [email protected]
  > Subject: [rti_india] Re: Habibullah lies again
  > 
  > Dear Sharmaji
  > 
  > This is an extremely serious matter. You seem to be absolutely correct. 
This is a Mational Institute of Technology (formerly known as RECs) directly 
under the Ministry of HRD. Here is the RTI page of the Srinagar Institute 
http://www.nitsri.net/rti.html it says "Page under construction"
  > 
  > Page under construction for 5 years ??
  > 
  > Here is the RTI page of say the NIT Warnagal
  > 
http://www.nitw.ac.in/NitwNew/announcementFiles/122/NITW-RTI-ACT/NITW-RTI-ACT-1-2005.htm
  > All 17 manuals apparently in place.
  > 
  > So 2 questions arise in my mind
  > 1) Which "Nation" does the National in the title of NTISRI refer to?
  > 2) Is Mr (oops Janab) Habibullah (Saheb) holding an office of profit under 
the Govt of India, especially as you say he gets to recommend 5 candidates per 
year?
  > 
  > Janab Habibullah has some serious answering to do to the citizens of THIS 
Nation.
  > 
  > Sarbajit
  > 
  > --- In [email protected], "S.D. Sharma" <anonsharma@> wrote:
  > >
  > > Evry thing Habibulah touches is kiss of death for these fully corrupt 
persons.
  > > 
  > > In J&K Srinagar there is a deemd university called as National
  > > Institutte of Techonlgy
  > > which is regional engginering college. It is "Institute of Natonal
  > > Imprtance" vid
  > > a central Act from 2003. Itis finance since 2nd Plan by central govt, its 
Board
  > > of director mainly IAS & other government officers. Til date this
  > > institute is not
  > > complying with RTI Act because it's chairman has certified in writing that
  > > RTIU Act is not applying to this institute becuase it is situated in J&K 
and
  > > section 1(2) of RTI Act "whole of India excepting State of Jammu and 
kashmir".
  > > 
  > > 63+ RTI 2nd appeal against this college are sent to C.I.C. since 2006
  > > mainly from
  > > refugee Pandit community. Not a single appeal listed, & all papers are
  > > being misplace.
  > > Family of appllicants are being threatened by CrPF BSF not to pursue..
  > > 
  > > Who is this governor of the Institute. Please read the biodata.
  > > http://www.nitsri.net/chairman.html
  > > What is his email - "whabibullah@"
  > > What is his title - "Jenab Wajahat Habibullah Sahib, IAS Chief
  > > Information Commissioner, Chief Information Commission, Government of
  > > India Room No. 306, 2nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama
  > > Place, R. K. Puram, New Delhi -110 066."
  > > http://www.nitsri.net/administration/bog.htm
  > > 
  > > This is same corrupt secularist person who orders Muslims in J&K like
  > > Muzaffar Bhat to be given information on BSF where RTI Act does not
  > > applicable, but not refugee Hindu Pandit youths in Dehli & Mumbai
  > > where RTI Act is enforced to know why theyre not getting engginerring
  > > seat in J&K. As NTISRI Govrnor do you know that Habibulah gets 5
  > > managment seats quota each year.
  > > 
  > > S D Sharma
  > > 
  > > On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 8:54 PM, ashish kr1965 <ashishkr1965@> wrote:
  > > > Dear Sarbjit
  > > >
  > > > Why do you say that Mr. Habibullah is lying ?
  > > >
  > > > Where is the inconsistency with what IC.X told you ?
  > > >
  > > > Is Mr. Habibullah wrong when he says that there was
  > > > no prior contact from DoPT till after the selection
  > > > by their committee. when the bio-data of every eligible
  > > > "eminent" person is already available to it (magically)
  > > > to attach to the agenda for the meetings of the.selection
  > > > committee ?
  > > >
  > > > Is Mr Habibullah wrong when he says that selection
  > > > of candidates is not by application ?.The fact that
  > > > Sushma Singh got her application for the position
  > > > recommended by the powerful Minister she worked
  > > > under equally clearly had nothing to do with her selection.
  > > > In fact her orders speak for themselves. As also the fact
  > > > that Mr Habibullah loses nothing to recommend 14
  > > > candidates to the selection committee knowing clearly
  > > > that none would be selected, the ultimate kiss of death
  > > > if there was one.
  > > >
  > > > Ashish
  > > >
  > > > On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 5:51 PM, sarbajitr <sroy1947@> wrote:
  > > >>
  > > >>
  > > >>
  > > >> At least 1 Central Information Commissioner has told me that he had 
settled down to a nice retired life away from Delhi to devote himself to 
academic and literary pursuits, when he received a phone call from Ms Sonia 
Gandhi asking him to become a Commissioner. He then received a phone call 2 
days later asking him to submit his bio-data. Mr Habibullah knows as well as I 
do who made this statement (and to many persons other than myself).
  > > >>
  > > >> Sarbajit
  > > >>
  > > >> --- In [email protected], sarbajit roy <sroy1947@> wrote:
  > > >> >
  > > >> > From: wajahat
  > > >> > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 10:01 AM
  > > >> > To: Dr. Leo Rebello
  > > >> > Subject: Re: APPOINTMENT OF CCIC
  > > >> >
  > > >> > Just a small clarification in your correspondence-unlike what is 
said, as far as I know none of the IC nominees were contacted by the DoPT
  > > >> > before their names were submitted to the Comittee but only after 
selection by the Committee. The exercise is clearly not undertaken on the basis 
of applications
  > > >> > Wajahat
  > > >
  > >
  >



  

Reply via email to