Dear Rakesh Welcome back to this list.
Could you instead do a point-wise analysis of Mr Habibullah's legally bankrupt and completely corrupt decision in your appeal d/d 30.Aug.2010 against Supreme Court and which Mr Habibullah referred to extensively in Shekhar Singh matter d/d 6.Sep.2010 to give Mr Singh information . Sarbajit On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:39 AM, growth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > *Even Rich Man (but without proper connection including underworld) has > no fundamental right of information as per Certain Central Information > Commissioner. * > > Dear Friends > > Certain Central Information Commissioner, think , poor has no right to > Information. This articles is available on the web. > > > <https://docs.google.com/document/edit?id=1YLig3cxrf77-O2OvNPNsTyaH5hsk3-tTRXBuDQIqtTc&hl=en> > on > rti india 8-9-2010 > > Now, we see that Certain Information Commissioners had decided (Supreme > Court cases) that there is no inconsistency with the Right to information, > if information is provided to poor at the 250% times of reasonable cost > determined by the Supreme court of India/ Government Of India increased > various exemptions and shorten the right to information and made the > procedure cumbersome for the remaining 30% citizen to protect the Corrupt > officials. > > 1 > > . Information under RTI act can be obtain in various forms (including soft > copy and uncertified copies) . Whereas SCI Rules 1966, Published at web ( > https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1CLOOo8dqqsDQyBKK2PAEJrrh7_LBOcbO_5sN0iIXSHg > ) Kindly note, during pendency of case in The Supreme Court of India , > only inspection is allowed under SCI Rules 1966. No one(including party to > the case) can obtain copies of document (kindly see Rule 3 of Order XII > at Page 35 of SCI Rules 1966). Kindly note, corruption is rampant in India, > and there are reported cases Like Ansal Builders –Delhi Uphar Cinema Fire > Court case, in which documents were changed / removed in the Courts with the > help of Court staff. And certain court staffs are under suspension. By > denying information like copies and scan copies, it is protection (and > encouragement ) to corrupt court staff, who help in change of documents > because in the absence of previous (old correct) documents copies, it > will be difficult to prove that document are changed/ removed > > And after the case is decided , only hard certified copy are allowed. > > > This exemption is big relief to corrupt officials , Court decisions take > decade in the decisions, after word , when apparent error is pointed out to > Court like in Bhopal case to the Supreme Court then , it rejected on the > limitations point only. > > 2. > > *Increase in scope of exemptions . (by wrong CIC order) * > > As explained above scope of exemption is already increased , even party to > the case , are not provided copies from the file. During the pendency of > case, normally information is denied to third ,although no exemption under > Section 8(1)/9 of the RTI Act, may be applicable. > > 3 > > other benefits (available under RTI Act, 2005 ) are also withdrawn from > Citizen by the above wrong decisions will be explained in the next articles. > > > > With regards > > Rakesh gupta > >
