Alex Dubov wrote:
> 
> I heard about KURT only recently, and it's seems that it has some nice
> features (just like many other systems, that are referred in KURT
> brochure). But the real problem that I wanted to address is not feature
> addition, but the diversity of effort. RTlinux is a most used RT
> environment for linux, so I hope that it is a right place to start an
> _unification_ project, with the main aim to bring the standard RT
> support into the LinuxOS (or GNU/HURD OS or whatever).
>  The main complication, caused by the Bazaar development model, is an
> absence of standards. If it will be possible to create a standard
> development model at least in one area of linux deployment, it will give
> a major trust to all Linux Project.
>         Alex Dubov.

Hi Alex,

People may not agree on the detail or the development model to use, but
I think that most people would like to see this unification, and this
indeed was the primary motivation behind the recent Real Time Linux
Workshop.  Take a look at 
        http://www.realtimelinux.org/ 
and 
        http://www.thinkingnerds.com/projects/rtl-ws/rtl-ws.html

for more background on this.

Regards, Stuart.


--- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/

Reply via email to