Dresner, Norman A. writes:
> Based on a layman's reading of the LGPL, it's required to release source
> code for any LGPL-software that you modify; you can simply provide URL's
> pointing to the source of unmodified LGPL-code. It is not required that you
> release source code for any of your own programs that are distributed in
> binary form.
>
> If the (L)GPL code you incorporate is linked into the binary, then the
> preceding paragraph applies separately to the linked-libraries and your own
> code.
Iy I understand these licenses correctly, you can link against LGPL'ed
code and keep your program closed - only the source of the library
needs to be distributed (v.s.).
With GPL it is differentm though: If you link to GPL'ed code, the
whole program is covered by GPL ! (That's why LGPL was put into life.)
Jochen
--
Heinrich-Heine-Universität
Institut für Physikalische Chemie I
Jochen Küpper
Universitätsstr. 1, Geb. 26.43 Raum 02.29
40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
phone ++49-211-8113681, fax ++49-211-8115195
http://www.Jochen-Kuepper.de
-- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/