Dresner, Norman A. writes:
 > Based on a layman's reading of the LGPL, it's required to release source
 > code for any LGPL-software that you modify; you can simply provide URL's
 > pointing to the source of unmodified LGPL-code.  It is not required that you
 > release source code for any of your own programs that are distributed in
 > binary form.  
 > 
 > If the (L)GPL code you incorporate is linked into the binary, then the
 > preceding paragraph applies separately to the linked-libraries and your own
 > code.

Iy I understand these licenses correctly, you can link against LGPL'ed
code and keep your program closed - only the source of the library
needs to be distributed (v.s.).

With GPL it is differentm though: If you link to GPL'ed code, the
whole program is covered by GPL ! (That's why LGPL was put into life.)

Jochen
-- 
Heinrich-Heine-Universität
Institut für Physikalische Chemie I
Jochen Küpper
Universitätsstr. 1, Geb. 26.43 Raum 02.29
40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
phone ++49-211-8113681, fax ++49-211-8115195
http://www.Jochen-Kuepper.de
-- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/

Reply via email to