What an interesting idea. Placing functions in shared memory. I guess they
would execute properly, wouldn't they? Someone?
I have had success with shared memory storage by defining structures, and
then assigning pointers to said structures via mbuff_alloc() OR ioremap().
i.e. see inserted file...
Todd Gearheart
Software Engineer Dept 041
FlightSafety
International
Simulation Systems Division
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(316) 612-5356
-----Original Message-----
From: Dirk Pohl [EIT] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 5:56 AM
To: RTLinux Mail
Subject: [rtl] shared memory for functions (and mapped objects, how?)
Hi again,
after reading the shared memory thread I think that the problem discribed
there triggered another question for me:
Assuming that I made a shared memory block for access from Linux and
RTLinux, how do I force objects (or functions) to be placed exactly there?
At the moment I only see the possibility of writing a huge block of data
there and accessing it from the 'other side'.
Are there any "new" extensions that can put objects in memory where I want
them (i.e., the shared mem area)?
On Jan 24, 2001, bionic wrote: "... after instanciating, map the objects
to the shared mem area".
How is that done? Maybe this is the absolute beginner question, ...
In my books, i didn't find anything about this. Are there books which you
would suggest covering this?
Thank's in advance
Dirk Pohl
University of Kaiserslautern
-- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
binka.c
