Klaus Keppler wrote: > Hi Jan, > >> I was trying to merge your patch into SVN, but I ran into some troubles >> because the patch contains a rt_r8169_n.c file (instead of plain >> rt_r8169.c). Just rename it? > > > No problem, that's just a historic issue (Realtek's original driver > is named 'rt_r8169_n.c'). Don't know what the '_n' stands for... :-/ >
I'm making progress with the merge but I stumbled over a few issues when compiling against a 2.6.12. Some were related to changes in SVN, and most were easy to fix. But this one remained: rt_r8169.c:689: SET_NETDEV_DEV(rtdev, &pdev->dev); This cannot work as the macro addresses a field of net_device rtnet_device does not provide. Are you compiling against 2.4??? Anyway, is disabling of that line ok? > I'll try to continue working with a SVN snapshot the next days... > Ok, but you should note that SVN so far only works with fusion-CVS respectively the soon-to-be-released version 0.9. RTAI/classic support is still searching for a contributor. Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
