On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 05:34:22PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >I've just noticed the discrepancy between the drivers (X-rt.ko) and the > >examples (rt_X.ko). Should we streamline this?
> Mmh, could be better - the users will have to learn some new things > anyhow. But in which direction? I'm so indecisive. rt_eepro100, > rt_loopback? Or client-rt, server-rt? Mmh, mmh. I think many projects > for real-time linux go the first way, so should we. Objections? RTAI has rtai_foo.ko This is a prefix followed by an underscore...We should do it the same way. 'rt_' Marc -- #!/bin/sh set - `type $0` 'tr "[a-zA-Z]" "[n-za-mN-ZA-M]"';while [ "$2" != "" ];do \ shift;done; echo 'frq -a -rc '`echo "$0"| $1 `'>$UBZR/.`rpub signature|'`\ echo $1|$1`'`;rpub "Jr ner fvtangher bs obet. Erfvfgnapr vf shgvyr!"'|$1|sh ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
