On 07/05/2005 11:51 PM Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Also on my MPC860 module I see large calibrated master-to-slave packet
>>> delays. 440 seconds, this looks like an endianess problem or a wrong
>>> (64-bit?) calculation.
>>>
>> 
>> Oops. Ok, let's wait for the binary dump - and what Ethereal dissects.
>> 
> 
> The dump revealed that there is some problem on the master side (you can
>  follow this explanations by opening your dump in a recent Ethereal):
> 
> The slave sends its calibration requests including a "Transmission Time
> Stamp". This value should be copied by the master on reception into the
> calibration reply frame ("Request Transmission Time"). For unknown
> reasons, this field is always 0 in your dump. All systems I tested so
> far did not show this effect (ok, all were x86). It immediately leads to
> such exorbitant round-trip delays.
> 
> Could you try to debug this further? The involved code in the TDMA
> module can be found here:
> 
> http://www.rts.uni-hannover.de/rtnet/lxr/source/stack/rtmac/tdma/tdma_proto.c#L261
> 
> The copy is performed in line 297. Please check if the value is
> correctly transfered and probably overwritten afterwards (in the 3com
> driver?) or if 0 is already contained in the reply frame.

The value of REQ_CAL_FRM(head)->xmit_stamp) is already 0. The first 10
long-words at "head" are:

head d470c954 head->xmit_stamp d470c958
0x10000102 0x0 0x0 0x95010000 0x0 0x20a10700 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0

Strange... I also see the same data in the RX buffer of 3com RTnet
driver. More soon...

Thanks.

Wolfgang.



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
RTnet-users mailing list
RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users

Reply via email to