Bernhard Breinbauer wrote: > Hello list! > > I am evaluating the performance of RTnet under several load conditions. The > (so called) network consists of two cross-connected PC's with RTL8169 gigabit > NIC's. > Starting RTnet with the delivered start script is working fine, but I would > like to avoid using a RTcfg server. So I tried to produce a procedure for a > statically configured RTnet network (mostly extracted from the start script): > 1) loading modules like: rtnet.ko, rtipv4.ko,.... > 2) `rtifconfig rtlo up 127.0.0.1` > 3) loading modules: rtmac.ko and tdma.ko > 4) `rtifconfig rteth0 up 10.0.0.1` > 5) update routing table with rtroute, to provide a route to the other PC
Stop. Check the routing tables on both sides after this step (How do you set the routes? Via rtroute solicite?). Also try if rtping works. If not, some link problem or some issue with the driver likely exists. > 6) run `tdmacfg rteth0 server 10000` on the master > 7) run `tdmacfg rteth0 slave` on the slave > 8) run `tdmacfg slot 0 2000` on the slave (does not return, because it starts > calibration as stated in the docu) > 9) run `tdmacfg slot 0 0` on the master (does finish nearly instantly) > (If one of the above commands is syntactically wrong, it is because I am not > at the test PC at the moment and I have to dig this out of my memory.) > > The command issued in step 8) does not finish, I suppose because calibration > never succeeds. > Ethereal tells me 0 sending/receiving packets, on both sides. But as far as I > can tell at least the SOF should be transmitted? > > So, does anybody know what goes wrong in my setup? Or has an advice what to > change? > > Best regards, > bernhard > Unrelated to this problem: Why not using RTcfg? Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
