Imre Paniti wrote: > 2006/8/14, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Imre Paniti wrote: >> > We want to test our RTnet aplication to see if the timing is right. >> >> What timing? On the cable? > > > The time difference between sending and reciving. > >> Actually we find a page for Active Probing at >> > http://www.cubinlab.ee.unimelb.edu.au/probing/software.php#tsc-rt-linux >> > but they dealing with RTnet based on RTLinux. >> > Our environment: 2 PC with 2.6.15 kernel, RTAI-3.3-cv and RTnet 0.9.3 >> > The NICs are RT8139. >> > >> > Do you have some suggestions for us? >> >> Do you have a chance to attach a third station as a sniffer to your >> network (works best with one of the rare 100 MBit hubs...)? Then >> grabbing the traffic with RTnet+RTcap on that box would give you a good >> impression with accurate timestamps (in the order of IRQ latencies). >> >> Jan > > > Thanks for the idea! > We can do that, but what about using RTnet+RTcap (+Ethereal as a capturing > tool) on those PCs without a third station?
Also feasible. You just have different clocks then. And you see things like the stations see them. If you plan to load the boxes in order to generate worst case behaviour, your locally taken timestamps will suffer as well. Therefore the idea of a third station dedicated to measuring. Jan Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
