On 9/5/06, Teresa Noviello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, i made a mistake.
The return value of send_to is "-9" and is not in the switch_errno error list, because i call that function and i know that.
On 9/5/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Teresa Noviello wrote:
> Hi! I have modified rtt-sender.c and rtt-responder.c in the way you see in
> attachments, i use them in two different shells with the two commands (on
> the same machine):
>
> 1. ./rtt-sender -d 127.0.0.1
> 2. ./rtt-responder -l 127.0.0.1
>
> rtt-sender goes in Segmentation Fault and rtt-responder remains up. What i
> do wrong?
>
> I see in debug messages that sendto_rt in transmitter function doesnt't
> send
> anything! Why?
> the messages are:
>
> sendo failed - perror: Success.
This is due to the fact that sendto_rt is not the POSIX variant, it's
the native real-time interface (and its obsolete, new naming scheme:
rt_dev_sendto). Only the wrapped POSIX sendto would set errno correctly,
but I'm not up-to-date with the RTAI status here. So, try to catch the
result of sendto_rt directly and print that one.
The sendto_rt result is: 1
I have no idea of what does it mean.
The return value of send_to is "-9" and is not in the switch_errno error list, because i call that function and i know that.
What can i do with this number? where i have to search to understand what is it?
--
Teresa Noviello
Chiedersi Sempre:"Avro' il tempo di rifarlo?"
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
