> > Hello,
> >=20
> > In order to test rtcap+wireshark perf to see if it could 
> analize a full=
>  loaded traffic,
> > I ran a simple program that sends n UDP packets of 1 kBytes 
> from a box =
> (xenomai 2.3.1+ rtnet 0.9.9+ e1000)
> > to another (xenomai 2.3.1+ rtnet 0.9.9+ eepro100 + rtcap + 
> wireshark).
> > Packets are sent without delay between each of them.
> > If more than 100 packets are sent, wireshark only shows 82 
> captured pac=
> kets and rt_sendmsg function doesn't=20
> > return any error.
> > What could be the source of this loss ?=20
> > Is it sure that packets are really sent ? Is there a means 
> to know how =
> many packet did the NIC really send ?
> > Did rt_dev_sendmsg return error if NIC has not enough 
> buffer space at d=
> river layer or below ?
> 
> If you are sending at a very high rate, you may temporarily 
> overload the
>  sniffer. That may mean the RT queues overflow (not likely if 
> both boxes
> have similar performance) or Linux fails to process all 
> sniffed packets
> in time (because the RT load is too high. Check the drop counter under
> "ifconfig rteth0", maybe it is non-zero. Still, there are 128 
> buffers in
> the rtcap pool by default (module parameter "rtcap_rtskbs" or 
> rtcap.ko).
> Also check if there are any suspicious error messages on any kernel
> console of both boxes.

Ok, it seems that wireshark is overloaded.
No suspicious kernel error message.
No packets are dropped neither in receiving nor sending box.
BTW, for both, only RX packets counter increases. 
The TX packets counter doesn't increase for sending box, why ?

Moreover, when promisc mode is activated and 
rtcap_rtskbs > number of sent packets, are the packets stored
until wireshark has time to process them ? Is there an other
buffer size to increase ?

Niry.

This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee. It may contain privileged 
information.
If you are not the addressee you must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any 
of the information in it. 
If you have received it in error please delete it and immediately notify the 
sender.
Security Notice: all e-mail, sent to or from this address, may be accessed by 
someone other than the recipient, for system management and security reasons. 
This access is controlled under Regulation of security reasons.
This access is controlled under Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, 
Lawful Business Practises.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
RTnet-users mailing list
RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users

Reply via email to