On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 12:08:48PM +0200, M. Koehrer wrote:
> a while ago I posted already a mail concerning this question.
> http://www.mail-archive.com/rtnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01687.html
> The question was if rtnet will support Ingo Molnar's kernel_preempt
> patch. As there is already a native rtdm the missing pieces are to
> extend the native rtdm (or to create another variant of rtdm for the
> kernel preempt_patch). Also, the build system of rtnet has to be
> adapted to support this. Are there any news on this issue?

We are currently doing some research in order to find out what is
possible with the vanilla Linux network stack and determinism. Although
it is a little bit too early for solid results, the first tests we did
today indicate that it is possible to get 200 ... 300 us round trip time
between two boxes, both running 2.6.22.1-rt9 (although no real load on
the boxes yet, so no worst case). The histograms show that most round
trip times are around 100 us. The code is standard userspace POSIX code,
using raw and packet sockets.

Before we'll provide more measurement results we have to code proper
load scenarios.

Robert
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
     Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-206917-9


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
RTnet-users mailing list
RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users

Reply via email to