Am 11.09.2010 22:06, Flavio de Castro Alves Filho wrote: > Hello Jan, > > In our case, it is possible to know when the non-rt traffic will > occur. So, maybe the proxy solutions seams to be appropriate. But the > encapsulation solutions seams nice too. > > Another question: does, in both cases, the communication work with the > currect telnet and ftp binaries? Should I have to recompile something? > My concern is about the socket api which might have been used by these > applications and the absence of the eth0 interface.
Both proxy and RTmac expose a Linux networking interface that will allow to use high stack layer and application without changes. Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
