> While that's cute, this kind of micro benchmark doesn't translate into > performance on any real world code. > > As I said above, I'll bet that if you run this benchmark and allow the JIT to > run, you'll see it's as fast or faster than crystalize.
Ahh thanks. I was wondering why my numbers didn't seem to add up to some I'd seen previously. Making it a method results in 1.9.1: 12.4s rbx 2.6s crystalizer 5.3s crystalizer optimized: 3.5s Pretty impressive for Rubinius' side. That should give me enough to chew on. Does anybody out there have any sinatra/rails benchmarks for rubinius? -r -- --- !ruby/object:MailingList name: rubinius-dev view: http://groups.google.com/group/rubinius-dev?hl=en post: [email protected] unsubscribe: [email protected]
