On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:22 AM, flebber <[email protected]> wrote: > 2. Better than JRE. The JRE is has evolved and has a lot of mature > libraries written against it. So for Rubinius to be better it will > need to mature and have contributors write and develop libraires.
The same could be said for any Ruby VM. Since most Ruby folks aren't using the JVM, I don't really see that as a strong need for Rubinius in particular--non-JRuby users are already using Ruby-only libs anyway. Dave -- --- !ruby/object:MailingList name: rubinius-dev view: http://groups.google.com/group/rubinius-dev?hl=en post: [email protected] unsubscribe: [email protected]
