For what it's worth I would consider hosting a gem at rubyforge more
analogous to posting something to CPAN, which is certainly okay (at
least according to those pesky mod_perl/httpd hackers who have apreq2
in CPAN).
-Brian
On Feb 14, 2007, at 3:13 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 10:07 PM, Ross Singer wrote:
I guess I don't see how the 'apache way' excludes Solr hosting
gems at
RubyForge when its flagship project is hosted in every repository
system out there.
It doesn't exclude it at all... I'm simply exploring ways in which
we can use what we have here at Apache.
For more on the official Apache release policies, read here:
<http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html>
Erik
