On 2/15/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 11:00 AM, Coda Hale wrote:
> On 2/15/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> solr-ruby
>> solr-client
>
> Either of those seems reasonable. I'm kind of pulling towards
> solr-client since -ruby is mostly used for bindings, it seems.
Isnt' solrb a binding to Solr?
If Solr was a local library which needed to be wrapped in a friendly
Ruby layer, yes. As it is, it's a client to an external service. ;-)
cf. libxml-ruby vs. memcache-client.
Not like there's a huge orthodoxy on this subject, though.
--
Coda Hale
http://blog.codahale.com
