On 11 July 2014 at 09:29:49, 'Marcin Owsiany' via ruby-fog
([email protected]) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to design the Google Cloud DNS provider for Fog, and the first
> question I face is which collections to expose?
>
> It seems that most DNS providers expose "records" and "zones", but at least
> one has some extras. For example stormondemand also has "domains" and
> "reverses".
>
> Given that, I'm wondering how hard should I try to squeeze into that model
> the concepts used by Google Cloud DNS (i.e. its "RR sets" and "changes"
> resources)?
>
The Resource Record Sets and Changes resources sounds very similar to the api
that route 53 (aws) has. Perhaps draw some inspiration from there?
Fred
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ruby-fog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
