Dne 13.12.2010 14:56, Chris Lalancette napsal(a): > On 12/11/10 - 08:56:54AM, Gaveen Prabhasara wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Chris Lalancette<clala...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> On 12/10/10 - 01:46:31PM, Michael Stahnke wrote: >>>> I've been wondering which version of Rails we should try to put into >>>> EPEL6. Right now, obviously, Rails 2.3.x is pretty popular, however, >>>> in looking forward at a 7 year life-cycle, it seems like Rails 3 might >>>> be a good idea. My fear however, is that even the next version of >>>> Rails 3 will have abi/api breakage, so it will be very difficult to >>>> move. >>> As an FYI, I think there was some talk about putting Rails 3 into Fedora 15 >>> as well. I would think that we would go with Rails 3 for both, if possible, >>> though we'd want to check out how many packages already in Fedora might >>> break >>> if we do that. >> +1 for Rails 3 on EPEL >> >> Rails community tends to catch up with new Rails versions pretty quickly >> and quite often even run on Edge. So I think it's quite logical to assume >> that Rails 3 would catch up soon. I'm pretty sure Rails 3 will come to pass >> before 7 years, but for the same reason 2.3.x could be outdated long long >> before that. So 3.x, IMO. >> >> It'd be nice if Fedora 15 also decides on Rails 3 with Ruby 1.9.2 (and also >> have a RVM setup for those who want to use). > I'm not sure about Ruby 1.9. I think the current plan is to stick with 1.8.7 > for Fedora 15. As I understand it, 1.9 has the potential to break extension > modules, so we should definitely tread lightly there. I would like a lot > more data on what packages are compatible with 1.9 before we go that route. > > Having RVM is a no-brainer; it is already in Fedora :). >
Hello, I'd like to point out that http://isitruby19.com/ already contains list of Ruby 1.9 in/compatible gems. Vit _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
