Dne 21.12.2010 04:15, Mohammed Morsi napsal(a): > On 12/20/2010 08:37 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 18.12.2010 02:48, Mohammed Morsi napsal(a): >>> Also the following are new gems which will need to be packaged >>> >>> * arel (1.0.1) >> I have prepared arel package here: >> http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-arel.spec >> http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-arel-2.0.6-1.fc14.src.rpm >> >> But I did not submitted it for review yet, because: >> >> 1) It does not pass its own test suite (nevertheless the problem is >> already fixed in upstream). >> 2) It is higher version than the one mentioned here, however, the arel >> 2.x should be backward compatible and much more performant. >> > If issues have been fixed in the upstream codebase but have not made > their way into the released tarball / gem, feel free to add them as > patches in the RPM spec with a comment containing a link to the relevant > upstream commit / bug. > > Also as you mentioned even if it a later version, so long as its > compatible we should be fine. I simply installed all these package via > 'gem' and originally came up with this gem list a couple months back, so > some of the gems could have gone through several versions since then (as > it seems is the case w/ arel). > > -Mo > _______________________________________________ > ruby-sig mailing list > ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Arel prepared for review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667954 Vit _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
