Hey all, On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This is the way how we should proceed, i.e. the 1.9.2 should become > default. Later we can consider what to do with 1.8 ... > I wonder what do you guys think about the Debian approach: http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2011/05/msg00105.html Looks like a win win. Replacing 1.8 does not mean that they cannot be installed in parallel I guess. It's my first email to the list. My apologies If I'm being to brave. Greetings to all! Rgds. > Vit > _______________________________________________ > ruby-sig mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig >
_______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
