then I am getting conflicting views since OpenNebula folks said they asked upstream and they were told to use data_mapper?
if anything we would just patch OpenNebula to use 'datamapper' if we have to No big deal. ----- Original Message ----- From: Marek Goldmann <[email protected]> To: Ruby SIG mailing list <[email protected]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:53:07 AM Subject: Re: Migration from RSpec 1.3 to RSpec 2.x Fun, I was looking at the release notes for latest datamapper and it seems they highlight "datamapper" over "data_mapper": http://datamapper.org/articles/datamapper-110-released.html It looks like they used the "dash version" earlier: http://datamapper.org/articles/datamapper-102-released.html http://datamapper.org/articles/datamapper-100-released.html ... IMHO the dash version is published for compatibility reasons. --Marek On 27 lip 2011, at 09:25, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Actually there are available both gems, datamapper as well as > data_mapper ... _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
