Yes, I believe that creating a new package is the right action to take. You should probably get into touch with the people that depend on ruby-ldap, first (repoquery shows that this should only be rubygem-activeldap). Generally, we should try to package as many libraries as gems, because we want to share gems between different ruby implementations in the future (ruby/jruby/whatever).
Regards, Bohuslav. ----- Original Message ----- > It looks like the upstream of ruby-ldap has moved to distribution as > a > gem only. I can get a tarball from github based upon a tag, but that > seems like a less good solution. > > Does this mean that the package ruby-ldap should be retired, and a > new > package rubygem-ruby-ldap should be added? This seems like quite a > bit of work for nothing more than a distribution methodology change, > but may be the best course. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > stahnma > _______________________________________________ > ruby-sig mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
